Accumulation of 11C-methionine in the normal pituitary gland on 11C-methionine PET.

Background For pituitary tumors, positron emission tomography (PET) with 11C-methonine (MET) has been reported as feasible to facilitate diagnosis. MET is well-known to accumulate in the normal pituitary glands, but almost no studies have examined the degree of MET accumulation in the normal pituitary gland. Purpose To investigate accumulation of MET in normal pituitary gland on PET/CT. Material and Methods Among patients who underwent PET/CT using MET over the past 7 years, 77 patients who fulfilled our criteria for normal pituitary glands were retrospectively selected. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for the pituitary gland was measured. Results SUVmax of MET in the pituitary gland was in the range of 0.9-6.6 (mean ± standard deviation = 2.60 ± 1.04). A negative correlation between SUVmax and patient age (y = -0.032 × + 4.29, n = 77, r = 0.55) was found by linear regression analysis. SUVmax of the pituitary gland did not differ significantly between women and men. Conclusion MET shows strong accumulation in normal pituitary gland. PET/CT would thus be feasible to differentiate between normal and abnormal pituitary glands.

PET/CT findings for tumors in the base of the skull: comparison of 18 F-FDG with 11 C-methionine.

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has been used to characterize various malignancies. There are few reports regarding the use of 11 C-methionine (MET)-PET/CT to characterize tumors in the skull base. PURPOSE: To compare MET-PET/CT with FDG-PET/CT in cases of tumors of the skull base. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Both MET-PET/CT and FDG-PET/CT were performed in 27 patients with tumors of the skull base. In all cases, pathology was determined by surgery or biopsy. The images were visually and independently reviewed by two reviewers. For qualitative analysis, the inter-rater agreement between two reviewers was measured. For semi-quantitative evaluation, the tumor-to-normal brain uptake ratios (T/N ratios) were calculated by dividing the maximum of standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for the tumor by the SUVmax of the normal contra-lateral cerebellar hemisphere. Difference in T/N ratios between FDG-PET/CT and MET-PET/CT was analyzed for statistical significance. RESULTS: On qualitative evaluation, the inter-rater agreement of MET-PET/CT was superior than that of FDG-PET/CT. MET uptake was interpreted as positive in every tumor by both reviewers. MET-PET/CT had a significantly higher T/N ratio than FDG-PET/CT (2.96 ± 1.25 vs. 1.02 ± 0.54, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MET-PET/CT showed superior inter-rater agreement and had higher uptake for tumors at the skull base than FDG-PET/CT. The present study suggests that MET-PET/CT has superior potential for imaging of tumors of the skull base.